The Dutch city of Drachten has undertaken an unusual experiment in traffic management. The roads serving forty-five thousand people are “verkeersbordvrij”: free of nearly all road signs. Drachten is one of several European test sites for a traffic planning approach called “unsafe is safe.”1 The city has removed its traffic signs, parking meters, and even parking spaces. The only rules are that drivers should yield to those on their right at an intersection, and that parked cars blocking others will be towed.


The result so far is counterintuitive: a dramatic improvement in vehicular safety. Without signs to obey mechanically (or, as studies have shown, disobey seventy percent of the time2), people are forced to drive more mindfully—operating their cars with more care and attention to the surrounding circumstances. They communicate more with pedestrians, bicyclists, and other drivers using hand signals and eye contact. They see other drivers rather than other cars. In an article describing the expansion of the experiment to a number of other European cities, including London’s Kensington neighborhood, traffic expert Hans Monderman told Germany’s Der Spiegel, “The many rules strip us of the most important thing: the ability to be considerate. We’re losing our capacity for socially responsible behavior. The greater the number of prescriptions, the more people’s sense of personal responsibility dwindles.”3

Law has long recognized the difference between rules and standards—between very precise boundaries like a speed limit and the much vaguer admonishment characteristic of negligence law that warns individuals simply to “act reasonably.” There are well-known tradeoffs between these approaches.4 Rules are less subject to ambiguity and, if crafted well, inform people exactly what they can do, even if individual situations may render the rule impractical or, worse, dangerous. Standards allow people to tailor their actions to a particular situation. Yet they also rely on the good judgment of often self-interested actors—or on little-constrained second-guessing of a jury or judge that later decrees whether someone’s actions were unreasonable.

A small lesson of the verkeersbordvrij experiment is that standards can work better than rules in unexpected contexts. A larger lesson has to do with the traffic expert’s claim about law and human behavior: the more we are regulated, the more we may choose to hew only and exactly to the regulation or, more precisely, to what we can get away with when the regulation is not perfectly enforced. When we face heavy regulation, we see and shape our behavior more in relation to reward and punishment by an arbitrary external authority, than because of a commitment to the kind of world our actions can help bring about.5 This observation is less about the difference between rules and standards than it is about the source of mandates: some may come from a process that a person views as alien, while others arise from a process in which the person takes an active part.

When the certainty of authority-sourced reward and punishment is lessened, we might predict two opposing results. The first is chaos: remove security guards and stores will be looted. The second is basic order maintained, as people choose to respect particular limits in the absence of enforcement. Such acting to reinforce a social fabric may still be due to a form of self-interest—game and norm theorists offer reasons why people help one another in terms that draw on longer-term mutual self-interest6—but it may also be because people have genuinely decided to treat others’ interests as their own.7 This might be because people feel a part of the process that brought about a shared mandate— even if compliance is not rigorously monitored. Honor codes, or students’ pledges not to engage in academically dishonest behavior, can apparently result in lower rates of self-reported cheating.8 Thus, without the traffic sign equivalent of pages of rules and regulations, students who apprentice to generalized codes of honor may be prone to higher levels of honesty in academic work—and benefit from a greater sense of camaraderie grounded in shared values.

More generally, order may remain when people see themselves as a part of a social system, a group of people—more than utter strangers but less than friends—with some overlap in outlook and goals. Whatever counts as a satisfying explanation, we see that sometimes the absence of law has not resulted in the absence of order.9 Under the right circumstances, people will behave charitably toward one another in the comparative absence or enforcement of rules that would otherwise compel that charity.

In modern cyberspace, an absence of rules (or at least enforcement) has led both to a generative blossoming and to a new round of challenges at multiple layers. If the Internet and its users experience a crisis of abuse—behaviors that artfully exploit the twin premises of trust and procrastination—it will be tempting to approach such challenges as ones of law and jurisdiction. This rule-and-sanction approach frames the project of cyberlaw by asking how public authorities can find and restrain those it deems to be bad actors online. Answers then look to entry points within networks and endpoints that can facilitate control. As the previous chapter explained, those points will be tethered appliances and software-as-service—functional, fashionable, but non-generative or only contingently generative.10

The “unsafe is safe” experiment highlights a different approach, one potentially as powerful as traditional rule and sanction, without the sacrifice of generativity entailed by the usual means of regulation effected through points of control, such as the appliancization described earlier in this book. When people can come to take the welfare of one another seriously and possess the tools to readily assist and limit each other, even the most precise and well-enforced rule from a traditional public source may be less effective than that uncompelled goodwill. Such an approach reframes the project of cyberlaw to ask: What are the technical tools and social structures that inspire people to act humanely online? How might they be available to help restrain the damage that malevolent outliers can wreak? How can we arrive at credible judgments about what counts as humane and what counts as malevolent? These questions may be particularly helpful to answer while cyberspace is still in its social infancy, its tools for group cohesion immature, and the attitudes of many of its users still in an early phase which treats Internet usage as either a tool to augment existing relationships or as a gateway to an undifferentiated library of information from indifferent sources. Such an atomistic conception of cyberspace naturally produces an environment without the social signaling, cues, and relationships that tend toward moderation in the absence of law.11 This is an outcome at odds with the original architecture of the Internet described in this book, an architecture built on neighborliness and cooperation among strangers occupying disparate network nodes.

The problem raised in the first part of this book underscores this dissonance between origins and current reality at the technical layer: PCs running wild, infected by and contributing to spyware, spam, and viruses because their users either do not know or do not care what they should be installing on their computers. The ubiquity of the PC among mainstream Internet users, and its flexibility that allows it to be reprogrammed at any instant, are both signal benefits and major flaws, just as the genius of the Web—allowing the on-the-fly composition of coherent pages of information from a staggering variety of unvetted sources—is also proving a serious vulnerability. In looking for ways to mitigate these flaws while preserving the benefits of such an open system, we can look to the other layers of the generative Internet which have been plagued with comparable problems, and the progress of their solutions. Some of these resemble verkeersbordvrij: curious experiments with unexpected success that suggest a set of solutions well suited to generative environments, so long as the people otherwise subject to more centralized regulation are willing to help contribute to order without it.

Recall that the Internet exists in layers—physical, protocol, application, content, social. Thanks to the modularity of the Internet’s design, network and software developers can become experts in one layer without having to know much about the others. Some legal academics have even proposed that regulation might be most efficiently tailored to respect the borders of these layers.12

For our purposes, we can examine the layers and analyze the solutions from one layer to provide insight into the problems of another. The pattern of generative success and vulnerability present in the PC and Internet at the technical layer is also visible in one of the more recent and high profile content-layer endeavors on the Internet: Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. It is currently among the top ten most popular Web sites in the world,13 and the story of Wikipedia’s success and subsequent problems—and evolving answers to them—provide clues to solutions for other layers. We need some new approaches. Without them, we face a Hobson’s choice between fear and lockdown.


Evangelists of proprietary networks and the Internet alike have touted access to knowledge and ideas. People have anticipated digital “libraries of Alexandria,” providing the world’s information within a few clicks.14 Because the Internet began with no particular content, this was at first an empty promise. Most knowledge was understood to reside in forms that were packaged and distributed piece by piece, profitable because of a scarcity made possible by physical limitations and the restrictions of copyright. Producers of educational materials, including dictionaries and encyclopedias, were slow to put their wares into digital form. They worried about cannibalizing their existing paper sales—for Encyclopaedia Britannica, $650 million in 1990.15 There was no good way of charging for the small transactions that a lookup of a single word or encyclopedia entry would require, and there were few ways to avoid users’ copying, pasting, and sharing what they found. Eventually Microsoft released the Encarta encyclopedia on CD-ROM in 1993 for just under $1,000, pressuring Britannica to experiment both with a CD-ROM and a subscription-only Web site in 1994.16


As the Internet exploded, the slow-to-change walled garden content of formal encyclopedias was bypassed by a generative proliferation of topical Web pages, and search engines that could pinpoint them. There was no gestalt, though: the top ten results for “Hitler” on Google could include a biography written by amateur historian Philip Gavin as part of his History Place Web site,17 a variety of texts from Holocaust remembrance organizations, and a site about “kitlers,” cats bearing uncanny resemblances to the tyrant.18 This scenario exhibits generativity along the classic Libertarian model: allow individuals the freedom to express themselves and they will as they choose. We are then free to read the results. The spirit of blogging also falls within this model. If any of the posted material is objectionable or inaccurate, people can either ignore it, request for it to be taken down, or find a theory on which to sue over it, perhaps imploring gatekeepers like site hosting companies to remove material that individual authors refuse to revise.

More self-consciously encyclopedic models emerged nearly simultaneously from two rather different sources—one the founder of the dot-org Free Software Foundation, and the other an entrepreneur who had achieved dot-com success in part from the operation of a search engine focused on salacious images.19

Richard Stallman is the first. He believes in a world where software is shared, with its benefits freely available to all, where those who understand the code can modify and adapt it to new purposes, and then share it further. This was the natural environment for Stallman in the 1980s as he worked among graduate students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and it parallels the environment in which the Internet and Web were invented. Stallman holds the same views on sharing other forms of intellectual expression, applying his philosophy across all of the Internet’s layers, and in 1999 he floated the idea of a free encyclopedia drawing from anyone who wanted to submit content, one article at a time. By 2001, some people were ready to give it a shot. Just as Stallman had sought to replace the proprietary Unix operating system with a similarly functioning but free alternative called GNU (“GNU’s Not Unix”), the project was first named “GNUpedia,” then GNE (“GNE’s Not an Encyclopedia”). There would be few restrictions on what those submissions would look like, lest bias be introduced:

Articles are submitted on the following provisions:

  • The article contains no previously copyrighted material (and if an article is consequently found to have offending material, it will then be removed).
  • The article contains no code that will damage the GNE systems or the systems from which users view GNE.
  • The article is not an advert, and has some informative content (persoengl [sic] information pages are not informative!).
  • The article is comprehensible (can be read and understood).20

These provisions made GNE little more than a collective blog sans comments: people would submit articles, and that would be that. Any attempt to enforce quality standards—beyond a skim to see if the article was “informative”— was eschewed. The GNE FAQ explained:

Why don’t you have editors?

There should be no level of “acceptable thought”. This means you have to tolerate being confronted by ideas and opinions different to your own, and for this we offer no apologies. GNE is a resource for spe [sic] speech, and we will strive to keep it that way. Unless some insane country with crazy libel laws tries to stop something, we will always try and fight for your spe [sic] speech, even if we perhaps don’t agree with your article. As such we will not allow any individuals to “edit” articles, thus opening GNE to the possibility of bias.21

As one might predict from its philosophy, at best GNE would be an accumulation of views rather than an encyclopedia—perhaps accounting for the “not” part of “GNE’s Not an Encyclopedia.” Today the GNE Web site is a digital ghost town. GNE was a generative experiment that failed, a place free of all digital traffic signs that never attracted any cars. It was eclipsed by another project that unequivocally aimed to be an encyclopedia, emanating from an unusual source.

Jimbo Wales founded the Bomis search engine and Web site at the onset of the dot-com boom in 1996.22 Bomis helped people find “erotic photography,”23 and earned money through advertising as well as subscription fees for premium content. In 2000, Wales took some of the money from Bomis to support a new idea: a quality encyclopedia free for everyone to access, copy, and alter for other purposes. He called it Nupedia, and it was to be built like other encyclopedias: through the commissioning of articles by experts. Wales hired philosopher Larry Sanger as editor in chief, and about twenty-five articles were completed over the course of three years.24

As the dot-com bubble burst and Bomis’s revenues dropped, Wales sought a way to produce the encyclopedia that involved neither paying people nor enduring a lengthy review process before articles were released to the public. He and his team had been intrigued at the prospect of involving the public at large, at first to draft some articles which could then be subject to Nupedia’s formal editing process, and then to offer “open review” comments to parallel a more elite peer review.25 Recollections are conflicted, but at some point software consultant Ward Cunningham’s wiki software was introduced to create a simple platform for contributing and making edits to others’ contributions. In January 2001, Wikipedia was announced to run alongside Nupedia and perhaps feed articles into it after review. Yet Nupedia was quickly eclipsed by its easily modifiable counterpart. Fragments of Nupedia exist online as of this writing, a fascinating time capsule.26 Wikipedia became an entity unto itself.27

Wikipedia began with three key attributes. The first was verkeersbordvrij. Not only were there few rules at first—the earliest ones merely emphasized the idea of maintaining a “neutral point of view” in Wikipedia’s contents, along with a commitment to eliminate materials that infringe copyright and an injunction to ignore any rules if they got in the way of building a great encyclopedia—but there were also no gatekeepers. The way the wiki software worked, anyone, registered or unregistered, could author or edit a page at any time, and those edits appeared instantaneously. This of course means that disaster could strike at any moment—someone could mistakenly or maliciously edit a page to say something wrong, offensive, or nonsensical. However, the wiki software made the price of a mistake low, because it automatically kept track of every single edit made to a page in sequence, and one could look back at the page in time-lapse to see how it appeared before each successive edit. If someone should take a carefully crafted article about Hitler and replace it with “Kilroy was here,” anyone else could come along later and revert the page with a few clicks to the way it was before the vandalism, reinstating the previous version. This is a far cry from the elements of perfect enforcement: there are few lines between enforcers and citizens; reaction to abuse is not instantaneous; and missteps generally remain recorded in a page history for later visitors to see if they are curious.

The second distinguishing attribute of Wikipedia was the provision of a discussion page alongside every main page. This allowed people to explain and justify their changes, and anyone disagreeing and changing something back could explain as well. Controversial changes made without any corresponding explanation on the discussion page could be reverted by others without having to rely on a judgment on the merits—instead, the absence of explanation for something non-self-explanatory could be reason enough to be skeptical of it. Debate was sure to arise on a system that accumulated everyone’s ideas on a subject in one article (rather than, say, having multiple articles written on the same subject, each from a different point of view, as GNE would have done). The discussion page provided a channel for such debate and helped new users of Wikipedia make a transition from simply reading its entries to making changes and to understanding that there was a group of people interested in the page on which changes were made and whom could be engaged in conversation before, during, and after editing the page.

The third crucial attribute of Wikipedia was a core of initial editors, many drawn from Nupedia, who shared a common ethos and some substantive expertise. In these early days, Wikipedia was a backwater; few knew of it, and rarely would a Wikipedia entry be among the top hits of a Google search.

Like the development of the Internet’s architecture, then, Wikipedia’s original design was simultaneously ambitious in scope but modest in execution, devoted to making something work without worrying about every problem that could come up if its extraordinary flexibility were abused. It embodied principles of trust-your-neighbor and procrastination, as well as “Postel’s Law,” a rule of thumb written by one of the Internet’s founders to describe a philosophy of Internet protocol development: “[B]e conservative in what you do; be liberal in what you accept from others.”28

Wikipedia’s initial developers shared the same goals and attitudes about the project, and they focused on getting articles written and developed instead of deciding who was or was not qualified or authorized to build on the wiki. These norms of behavior were learned by new users from the old ones through informal apprenticeships as they edited articles together.

The absence of rules was not nonnegotiable; this was not GNE. The procrastination principle suggests waiting for problems to arise before solving them. It does not eschew solutions entirely. There would be maximum openness until there was a problem, and then the problem would be tackled. Wikipedia’s rules would be developed on the wiki like a student-written and student-edited honor code. They were made publicly accessible and editable, in a separate area from that of the substantive encyclopedia.29 Try suddenly to edit an existing rule or add a new one and it will be reverted to its original state unless enough people are convinced that a change is called for. Most of the rules are substance-independent: they can be appealed to and argued about wholly apart from whatever argument might be going on about, say, how to characterize Hitler’s childhood in his biographical article.

From these beginnings there have been some tweaks to the wiki software behind Wikipedia, and a number of new rules as the enterprise has expanded and problems have arisen in part because of Wikipedia’s notoriety. For example, as Wikipedia grew it began to attract editors who had never crossed paths before, and who disagreed on the articles that they were simultaneously editing. One person would say that Scientology was a “cult,” the other would change that to “religion,” and the first would revert it back again. Should such an “edit war” be settled by whoever has the stamina to make the last edit? Wikipedia’s culture says no, and its users have developed the “three-revert rule.”30 An editor should not undo someone else’s edits to an article more than three times in one day. Disagreements can then be put to informal or formal mediation, where another Wikipedian, or other editors working on that particular article, can offer their views as to which version is more accurate—or whether the article, in the interest of maintaining a neutral point of view, should acknowledge that there is controversy about the issue.

For articles prone to vandalism—the entry for President George W. Bush, for example, or the front page of Wikipedia—administrators can create locks to ensure that unregistered or recently registered users may not make changes. Such locks are seen as necessary and temporary evils, and any administrator can choose to lift a lock at his or her discretion.31


How does an editor become an administrator with such powers? By making lots of edits and then applying for an administratorship. Wikipedians called “bureaucrats” have authority to promote editors to administrator status—or demote them. And to whom do the bureaucrats answer? Ultimately, to an elected arbitration committee, the board of Wikipedia’s parent Wikimedia Foundation, or to Jimbo Wales himself. (There are currently only a handful of bureaucrats, and they are appointed by other bureaucrats.)

Administrators can also prevent particular users from editing Wikipedia. Such blocks are rare and usually temporary. Persistent vandals usually get four warnings before any action is taken. The warnings are couched in a way that presumes—often against the weight of the evidence—that the vandals are acting in good faith, experimenting with editing capabilities on live pages when they should be practicing on test articles created for that purpose. Other transgressions include deleting others’ comments on the discussion page—since the discussion page is a wiki page, it can be edited in free form, making it possible to eliminate rather than answer someone else’s argument. Threatening legal action against a fellow Wikipedian is also grounds for a block.32

Blocks can be placed against individual user accounts, if people have registered, or against a particular IP address, for those who have not registered. IP addresses associated with anonymizing networks such as Tor are not allowed to edit Wikipedia at all.33

Along with sticks there are carrots, offered bottom-up rather than top-down. Each registered Wikipedia user is automatically granted a space for an individual user page, and a corresponding page for discussion with other Wikipedians, a free form drop box for comments or questions. If a user is deemed helpful, a practice has evolved of awarding “barnstars”—literally an image of a star. To award a barnstar, named after the metal stars used to decorate German barns,34 is simply to edit that user’s page to include a picture of the star and a note of thanks.35 Could a user simply award herself a pile of barnstars the way a megalomaniacal dictator can adorn himself with military ribbons? Yes, but that would defeat the point—and would require a bit of prohibited “sock puppetry,” as the user would need to create alter identities so the page’s edit history would show that the stars came from someone appearing to be other than the user herself.

* * *

Wikipedia has charted a path from crazy idea to stunning worldwide success. There are versions of Wikipedia in every major language—including one in simplified English for those who do not speak English fluently—and Wikipedia articles are now often among the top search engine hits for the topics they cover. The English language version surpassed one million articles in March of 2006, and it reached the 2 million mark the following September.36


Quality varies greatly. Articles on familiar topics can be highly informative, while more obscure ones are often uneven. Controversial topics like abortion and the Arab-Israeli conflict often boast thorough and highly developed articles. Perhaps this reflects Eric Raymond’s observation about the collaborative development of free software: “[g]iven enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.”37 To be sure, Raymond himself does not claim that the maxim he coined works beyond software, where code either objectively runs or it doesn’t. He has said that he thinks Wikipedia is “infested with moonbats”: “The more you look at what some of the Wikipedia contributors have done, the better Britannica looks.”38 Still, a controversial study by Nature in 2005 systematically compared a set of scientific entries from Wikipedia and Britannica (including some from the Britannica Web edition), and found a similar rate of error between them.39 For timeliness, Wikipedia wins hands-down: articles near-instantly appear about breaking events of note. For any given error that is pointed out, it can be corrected on Wikipedia in a heartbeat. Indeed, Wikipedia’s toughest critics can become Wikipedians simply by correcting errors as they find them, at least if they maintain the belief, not yet proven unreasonable, that successive changes to an article tend to improve it, so fixing an error will not be futile as others edit it later.



As we have seen, when the Internet and PC moved from backwater to mainstream, their success set the stage for a new round of problems. E-mail is no longer a curiosity but a necessity for most,40 and the prospect of cheaply reaching so many recipients has led to the scourge of spam, now said to account for over 90 percent of all e-mail.41 The value of the idle processing power of millions of Internet-connected PCs makes it worthwhile to hijack them, providing a new, powerful rationale for the creation of viruses and worms.42

Wikipedia’s generativity at the content level—soliciting uncoordinated contribution from tens of thousands of people—provides the basis for similar vulnerabilities now that it is so successful. It has weathered the most obvious perils well. Vandals might be annoying, but they are kept in check with a critical mass of Wikipedians who keep an eye on articles and quickly revert those that are mangled. Some Wikipedians even appear to enjoy this duty, declaring membership in the informal Counter-Vandalism Unit and, if dealing with vandalism tied to fraud, perhaps earning the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar.43 Still others have written scripts that detect the most obvious cases of vandalism and automatically fix them.44 And there remains the option of locking those pages that consistently attract trouble from edits by new or anonymous users.

But just as there is a clearer means of dealing with the threat of outright malicious viruses to PCs than there is to more gray-zone “badware,” vandals are the easy case for Wikipedia. The well-known controversy surrounding John Seigenthaler, Sr., a retired newspaper publisher and aide to Robert F. Kennedy, scratches the surface of the problem. There, a prankster had made an edit to the Wikipedia article about Seigenthaler suggesting that it had once been thought that he had been involved in the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and RFK.45 The statement was false but not manifestly obvious vandalism. The article sat unchanged for four months until a friend alerted Seigenthaler to it, replacing the entry with his official biography, which was then replaced with a short paraphrase as part of a policy to avoid copyright infringement claims.46 When Seigenthaler contacted Jimbo Wales about the issue, Wales ordered an administrator to delete Wikipedia’s record of the original edit.47 Seigenthaler then wrote an op-ed in USA Today decrying the libelous nature of the previous version of his Wikipedia article and the idea that the law would not require Wikipedia to take responsibility for what an anonymous editor wrote.48

Wikipedians have since agreed that biographies of living persons are especially sensitive, and they are encouraged to highlight unsourced or potentially libelous statements for quick review by other Wikipedians. Jimbo and a handful of other Wikipedia officials reserve the right not only to have an article edited—something anyone can do—but to change its edit history so the fact that it ever said a particular thing about someone will no longer be known to the general public, as was done with the libelous portion of the Seigenthaler article. Such practice is carried out not under legal requirements—in the United States, federal law protects information aggregators from liability for defamatory statements made by independent information providers from which they draw49—but as an ethical commitment.

Still, the reason that Seigenthaler’s entry went uncorrected for so long is likely that few people took notice of it. Until his op-ed appeared, he was not a national public figure, and Jimbo himself attributed the oversight to an increasing pace of article creation and edits—overwhelming the Wikipedians who have made a habit of keeping an eye on changes to articles. In response to the Seigenthaler incident, Wikipedia has altered its wiki software so that unregistered users cannot create new articles, but can only edit existing ones.50 (Of course, anyone can still register.)

This change takes care of casual or heat-of-the-moment vandalism, but it does little to address a new category of Wikipedian somewhere between committed community member and momentarily vandalizing teenager, one that creates tougher problems. This Wikipedian is someone who cares little about the social act of working with others to create an encyclopedia, but instead cares about the content of a particular Wikipedia entry. Now that a significant number of people consult Wikipedia as a resource, many of whom come to the site from search engine queries, Wikipedia’s contents have effects far beyond the site’s own community of user-editors.

One of Wikipedia’s community-developed standards is that individuals should not create or edit articles about themselves, nor prompt friends to do so. Instead they are to lobby on the article’s discussion page for other editors to make corrections or amplifications. (Jimbo himself has expressed regret for editing his own entry in Wikipedia in violation of this policy.)51 What about companies, or political aides? When a number of edits were made to politicians’ Wikipedia entries by Internet Protocol addresses traceable to Capitol Hill, Wikipedians publicized the incidents and tried to shame the politicians in question into denouncing the grooming of their entries.52 In some cases it has worked. After Congressman Marty Meehan’s chief of staff edited his entry to omit mention of a broken campaign promise to serve a limited number of terms, and subsequently replaced the text of the entire article with his official biography, Meehan repudiated the changes. He published a statement saying that it was a waste of time and energy for his staff to have made the edits (“[t]hough the actual time spent on this issue amounted to 11 minutes”) because “part of being an elected official is to be regularly commented on, praised, and criticized on the Web.”53 Meehan’s response sidestepped the issue of whether and how politicians ought to respond to material about them that they believe to be false or misleading. Surely, if the New York Times published a story that he thought was damaging, he would want to write a letter to the editor to set the record straight.

If the Wikipedia entry on Wal-Mart is one of the first hits in a search for the store, it will be important to Wal-Mart to make sure the entry is fair—or even more than fair, omitting true and relevant facts that nonetheless reflect poorly on the company. What can a group of volunteers do if a company or politician is implacably committed to editing an entry? The answer so far has been to muddle along, assuming the best intentions of all editors and hoping that there is epistemic strength in numbers.54 If disinterested but competent editors outnumber shills, the shills will find their edits reverted or honed, and if the shills persist, they can be halted by the three-revert rule.


In August 2006, a company called MyWikiBiz was launched to help people and companies promote themselves and shape their reputations on Wikipedia. “If your company or organization already has a well-designed, accurately-written article on Wikipedia, then congratulations—our services are not for you. However, if your business is lacking a well-written article on Wikipedia, read on—we’re here to help you!”55 MyWikiBiz offers to create a basic Wikipedia stub of three to five sentences about a company, with some links, for $49. A “standard article” fetches $79, with a premium service ($99) that includes checking the client’s Wikipedia article after a year to see “if further changes are needed.”56

Wikipedia’s reaction to MyWikiBiz was swift. Jimbo himself blocked the firm’s Wikipedia account on the basis of “paid editing on behalf of customers.”57 The indefinite block was one of only a handful recorded by Jimbo in Wikipedia’s history. Wales talked to the firm on the phone the same day and reported that they had come to an accommodation. Identifying the problem as a conflict of interest and appearance of impropriety arising from editors being paid to write by the subjects of the articles, Wales said that MyWikiBiz had agreed to post well-sourced “neutral point of view” articles about its clients on its own Web site, which regular Wikipedians could then choose to incorporate or not as they pleased into Wikipedia.58 Other Wikipedians disagreed with such a conservative outcome, believing that good content was good content, regardless of source, and that it should be judged on its merits, without a per se rule prohibiting direct entry by a for-profit firm like MyWikiBiz.

The accommodation was short-lived. Articles submitted or sourced by MyWikiBiz were nominated for deletion—itself a process that entails a discussion among any interested Wikipedians and then a judgment by any administrator about whether that discussion reached consensus on a deletion. MyWikiBiz participated wholeheartedly in those discussions and appealed to the earlier “Jimbo Concordat,” persuading some Wikipedians to remove their per se objections to an article because of its source. Wales himself participated in one of the discussions, saying that his prior agreement had been misrepresented and, after telling MyWikiBiz that it was on thin ice, once again banned it for what he viewed as spamming Wikipedia with corporate advertisements rather than “neutral point of view” articles.

As a result, MyWikiBiz has gone into “hibernation,” according to its founder, who maintains that all sources, even commercial ones, should be able to play a role in contributing to Wikipedia, especially since the sources for most articles and edits are not personally identifiable, even if they are submitted under the persistent pseudonyms that are Wikipedia user identities. Rules have evolved concerning those identities, too. In 2007, Wikipedia user Essjay, the administrator who cleaned Seigenthaler’s defamatory edit logs, was found to have misrepresented his credentials. Essjay had claimed to hold various graduate degrees along with a professorship in theology, and had contributed to many Wikipedia articles on the subject. When Jimbo Wales contacted him to discuss a job opportunity at Wales’s for-profit company Wikia, Essjay’s real identity was revealed. In fact, he was a twenty-four-year-old editor with no graduate degrees. His previous edits—and corresponding discussions in which he invoked his credentials—were called into question. In response to the controversy, and after a request for comments from the Wikipedia community,59 Jimbo proposed a rule whereby the credentials of those Wikipedia administrators who chose to assert them would be verified.60 Essjay retired from Wikipedia.61

* * *


A constitutional lawyer might review these tales of Wikipedia and see a mess of process that leads to a mess of substance: anonymous and ever-shifting users; a God-king who may or may not be able to act unilaterally;62 a set of rules now large enough to be confusing and ambiguous but small enough to fail to reach most challenges. And Wikipedia is decidedly not a democracy: consensus is favored over voting and its head counts. Much the same could be said about the development process for the Internet’s fundamental technical protocols, which is equally porous.63 The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has no “members”; anyone can participate. But it also has had a proliferation of standards and norms designed to channel arguments to productive resolution, along with venerated people in unelected positions of respect and authority who could, within broad boundaries, affect the path of Internet standards.64 As the Internet succeeded, the IETF’s standards and norms were tested by outsiders who did not share them. Corporate interests became keenly interested in protocol development, and they generally respond to their own particular pecuniary incentives rather than to arguments based on engineering efficiency. The IETF avoided the brunt of these problems because its standards are not self-enforcing; firms that build network hardware, or for-profit Internet Service Providers, ultimately decide how to make their routers behave. IETF endorsement of one standard or another, while helpful, is no longer crucial. With Wikipedia, decisions made by editors and administrators can affect real-world reputations since the articles are live and highly visible via search engines; firms do not individually choose to “adopt” Wikipedia the way they adopt Internet standards.

Yet Wikipedia’s awkward and clumsy growth in articles, and the rules governing their creation and editing, is so far a success story. It is in its essence a work in progress, one whose success is defined by the survival—even growth—of a core of editors who subscribe to and enforce its ethos, amid an influx of users who know nothing of that ethos. Wikipedia’s success, such as it is, is attributable to a messy combination of constantly updated technical tools and social conventions that elicit and reflect personal commitments from a critical mass of editors to engage in argument and debate about topics they care about. Together these tools and conventions facilitate a notion of “netizenship”: belonging to an Internet project that includes other people, rather than relating to the Internet as a deterministic information location and transmission tool or as a cash-and-carry service offered by a separate vendor responsible for its content.


We live under the rule of law when people are treated equally, without regard to their power or station; when the rules that apply to them arise legitimately from the consent of the governed; when those rules are clearly stated; and when there is a source of dispassionate, independent application of those rules.65

Despite the apparent mess of process and users, by these standards Wikipedia has charted a remarkable course. Although different users have different levels of capabilities, anyone can register, and anyone, if dedicated enough, can rise to the status of administrator. And while Jimbo Wales may have extraordinary influence, his power on Wikipedia depends in large measure on the consent of the governed—on the individual decisions of hundreds of administrators, any of whom can gainsay each other or him, but who tend to work together because of a shared vision for Wikipedia. The effective implementation of policy in turn rests on the thousands of active editors who may exert power in the shape of the tens of thousands of decisions they make as Wikipedia’s articles are edited and reedited. Behaviors that rise to the level of consistent practice are ultimately described and codified as potential policies, and some are then affirmed as operative ones, in a process that is itself constantly subject to revision.

In one extraordinary chat room conversation of Wikipedians recorded online, Wales himself laments that Larry Sanger is billed in several Wikipedia articles about Wikipedia as a “co-founder” of the encyclopedia. But apart from a few instances that he has since publicly regretted, Wales has not edited the articles himself, nor does he directly instruct others to change them with specific text, since that would violate the rule against editing articles about oneself. Instead, he makes a case that an unremarked use of the co-founder label is inaccurate, and implores people to consider how to improve it.66 At times—they are constantly in flux—Wikipedia’s articles about Wikipedia note that there is controversy over the “co-founder” label for Sanger. In another example of the limits of direct power, then-Wikimedia Foundation board member Angela Beesley fought to have the Wikipedia entry about her deleted. She was rebuffed, with administrators concluding that she was newsworthy enough to warrant one.67 (She tried again after resigning from the Foundation board, to no avail.)68

* * *

Wikipedia—with the cooperation of many Wikipedians—has developed a system of self-governance that has many indicia of the rule of law without heavy reliance on outside authority or boundary. To be sure, while outside regulation is not courted, Wikipedia’s policy on copyright infringement exhibits a desire to integrate with the law rather than reject it. Indeed, its copyright policy is much stricter than the laws of major jurisdictions require. In the United States, Wikipedia could wait for formal notifications of specific infringement before taking action to remove copyrighted material.69 And despite the fact that Wales himself is a fan of Ayn Rand70—whose philosophy of “objectivism” closely aligns with libertarian ideals, a triumph of the individual over the group—Wikipedia is a consummately communitarian enterprise.71 The activity of building and editing the encyclopedia is done in groups, though the structure of the wiki allows for large groups to naturally break up into manageable units most of the time: a nano-community coalesces around each article, often from five to twenty people at a time, augmented by non-subject-specific roving editors who enjoy generic tasks like line editing or categorizing articles. (Sometimes articles on roughly the same subject can develop independently, at which point there is a negotiation between the two sets of editors on whether and how to merge them.)

This structure is a natural form of what constitutionalists would call subsidiarity: centralized, “higher” forms of dispute resolution are reserved for special cases, while day-to-day work and decisions are undertaken in small, “local” groups.72 Decisions are made by those closest to the issues, preventing the lengthy, top-down processes of hierarchical systems. This subsidiarity is also expressed through the major groupings drawn according to language. Each different language version of Wikipedia forms its own policies, enforcement schemes, and norms. Sometimes these can track national or cultural standards—as a matter of course people from Poland primarily edit the Polish version of Wikipedia—but at other times they cross such boundaries. The Chinese language Wikipedia serves mainland China (when it is not being blocked by the government, which it frequently is),73 Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the many Chinese speakers scattered around the world.74

When disputes come up, consensus is sought before formality, and the lines between subject and regulator are thin. While not everyone has the powers of an administrator, the use of those special powers is reserved for persistent abuse rather than daily enforcement. It is the editors—that is, those who choose to participate—whose decisions and work collectively add up to an encyclopedia—or not. And most—at least prior to an invasion of political aides, PR firms, and other true cultural foreigners—subscribe to the notion that there is a divide between substance and process, and that there can be an appeal to content-independent rules on which meta-agreement can be reached, even as editors continue to dispute a fact or portrayal in a given article.

This is the essence of law: something larger than an arbitrary exercise of force, and something with meaning apart from a pretext for that force, one couched in neutral terms only for the purpose of social acceptability. It has been rediscovered among people who often profess little respect for their own sovereigns’ “real” law, following it not out of civic agreement or pride but because of a cynical balance of the penalties for being caught against the benefits of breaking it. Indeed, the idea that a “neutral point of view” even exists, and that it can be determined among people who disagree, is an amazingly quaint, perhaps even naïve, notion. Yet it is invoked earnestly and often productively on Wikipedia. Recall the traffic engineer’s observation about road signs and human behavior: “The greater the number of prescriptions, the more people’s sense of personal responsibility dwindles.”75 Wikipedia shows, if perhaps only for a fleeting moment under particularly fortuitous circumstances, that the inverse is also true: the fewer the number of prescriptions, the more people’s sense of personal responsibility escalates.

Wikipedia shows us that the naïveté of the Internet’s engineers in building generative network technology can be justified not just at the technical layer of the Internet, but at the content layer as well. The idiosyncratic system that has produced running code among talented (and some not-so-talented) engineers has been replicated among writers and artists.

There is a final safety valve to Wikipedia that encourages good-faith contribution and serves as a check on abuses of power that accretes among administrators and bureaucrats there: Wikipedia’s content is licensed so that anyone may copy and edit it, so long as attribution of its source is given and it is further shared under the same terms.76 This permits Wikipedia’s content to be sold or used in a commercial manner, so long as it is not proprietized—those who make use of Wikipedia’s content cannot claim copyright over works that follow from it. Thus dot-com Web sites like Answers.com mirror all of Wikipedia’s content and also display banner ads to make money, something Jimbo Wales has vowed never to do with Wikipedia.77 (A list maintained on Wikipedia shows dozens of such mirrors.)78 Mirrors can lead to problems for people like John Seigenthaler, who not only have to strive to correct misrepresentations in the original article on Wikipedia, but in any mirrors as well. But Wikipedia’s free content license has the benefit of allowing members of the Wikipedia community an option to exit—and to take a copy of the encyclopedia with them. It also allows for generative experimentation and growth. For example, third parties can come up with ways of identifying accurate articles on Wikipedia and then compile them as a more authoritative or vetted subset of the constant work-in-progress that the site represents.

Larry Sanger, the original editor of Nupedia and organizer (and, according to some, co-founder) of Wikipedia, has done just that. He has started “Citizendium,” an attempt to combine some of Nupedia’s original use of experts with Wikipedia’s appeal to the public at large. Citizendium seeks to fork Wikipedia, and solicit volunteers who agree not to be anonymous, so that their edits may be credited more readily, and their behavior made more accountable. If Citizendium draws enough people and content, links to it from other Web sites will follow, and, given enough links, its entries could appear as highly ranked search results. Wikipedia’s dominance has a certain measure of inertia to it, but the generative possibilities of its content, guaranteed by its choice of a permissive license, allow a further check on its prominence.

Wikipedia shows us a model for interpersonal interaction that goes beyond the scripts of customer and business. The discussions that take place adjunct to editing can be brusque, but the behavior that earns the most barnstars is directness, intelligence, and good faith. An owner of a company can be completely bemused that, in order to correct (and have stay corrected) what he sees as inaccuracies in an article about his firm, he will have to discuss the issues with random members of the public. Steve Scherf, co-founder of dot-com Gracenote, ended up engaged in an earnest, lengthy exchange with someone known as “Fatandhappy” about the way his company’s history was portrayed.79 The exchange was heated and clearly frustrating for Scherf, but after another Wikipedian intervened to make edits, Scherf pronounced himself happy if not thrilled with the revised text. These conversations are possible, and they are still the norm at Wikipedia.

The elements of Wikipedia that have led to its success can help us come to solutions for problems besetting generative successes at other layers of the Internet. They are verkeersbordvrij, a light regulatory touch coupled with an openness to flexible public involvement, including a way for members of the public to make changes, good or bad, with immediate effect; a focus on earnest discussion, including reference to neutral dispute resolution policies, as a means of being strengthened rather than driven by disagreements; and a core of people prepared to model an ethos that others can follow. With any of these pieces missing Wikipedia would likely not have worked. Dot-coms that have rushed in to adopt wikis as the latest cool technology have found mixed results. Microsoft’s Encarta Web site, in a naked concession to the popularity of Wikipedia, now has an empty box at the bottom of each article where users are asked to enter comments or corrections, which will be forwarded to the Encarta staff for review. Users receive no further feedback.

Makers of cars and soap have run contests80 for the public to make advertisements based on stock footage found in their respective commercials, complete with online editing tools so that amateurs can easily put their commercials together. Dove ran the winner of its contest during the Super Bowl.81 Many commercial Web sites like Amazon solicit customer reviews of products as a way to earn credibility with other customers—and some, like epinions.com, have business models premised entirely on the reviews themselves. Yelp.com asks for such ratings while also organizing its users into geographically based groups and giving them the basic tools of social networking: an ability to praise each other for good reviews, to name fellow reviewers as friends, and to discuss and comment on each others’ views. As one Yelp participant put it in reviewing the very Yelp “elite status” that she had just earned for contributing so many well-regarded reviews, “[It m]akes you feel special for about two weeks. Then you either realize you’re working for someone else without getting paid, you totally lose interest, or you get really into it.”82

Such “user-generated content,” whether cultivated through fully grassroots-motivated dot-org enterprises or well-constructed dot-com ones, forms part of a new hybrid economy now studied by Lessig, Benkler, von Hippel, and others. These public solicitations to manipulate corporate and cultural symbols, pitched at varying levels of expertise, may prove to be further building blocks of “semiotic democracy,” where we can participate in the making and remaking of cultural meanings instead of having them foisted upon us.83

But Wikipedia stands for more than the ability of people to craft their own knowledge and culture. It stands for the idea that people of diverse backgrounds can work together on a common project with, whatever its other weaknesses, a noble aim—bringing such knowledge to the world. Jimbo Wales has said that the open development model of Wikipedia is only a means to that end—recall that he started with the far more restrictive Nupedia development model. And we see that Wikipedia rejects straightforward democracy, favoring discussion and consensus over outright voting, thereby sidestepping the kinds of ballot-stuffing that can take place in a digital environment, whether because one person adopts multiple identities or because a person can simply ask friends to stack a sparsely attended vote.

Instead, Wikipedia has since come to stand for the idea that involvement of people in the information they read—whether to fix a typographical error or to join a debate over its veracity or completeness—is an important end itself, one made possible by the recursive generativity of a network that welcomes new outposts without gatekeepers; of software that can be created and deployed at those outposts; and of an ethos that welcomes new ideas without gatekeepers, one that asks the people bearing those ideas to argue for and substantiate them to those who question.

There are plenty of online services whose choices can affect our lives. For example, Google’s choices about how to rank and calculate its search results can determine which ideas have prominence and which do not. That is one reason why Google’s agreement to censor its own search results for the Chinese version of Google has attracted so much disapprobation.84 But even those who are most critical of Google’s actions appear to wish to pressure the company through standard channels: moral suasion, shareholder resolutions, government regulation compelling noncensorship, or a boycott to inflict financial pressure. Unlike Wikipedia, no one thinks that Google ought to be “governed” by its users in some democratic or communitarian way, even as it draws upon the wisdom of the crowds in deciding upon its rankings,85 basing them in part on the ways in which millions of individual Web sites have decided about to whom to link. Amazon and Yelp welcome user reviews (and reviews of those reviews), but the public at large does not “govern” these institutions.

People instinctively expect more of Wikipedia. They see it as a shared resource and a public one, even though it is not an arm of any territorial sovereign. The same could be said of the Internet Engineering Task Force and the Internet itself, but Wikipedia appears to have further found a way to involve nontechnical people in its governance. Every time someone reads a Wikipedia article and knowingly chooses not to vandalize it, he or she has an opportunity to identify with and reinforce its ethos. Wales is setting his sights next on a search engine built and governed on this model, “free and transparent” about its rankings, with a “huge degree of human community oversight.”86 The next chapters explore how that ethos may be replicable: vertically to solve generative problems found at other layers of the Internet, and horizontally to other applications within the content and social layers.


If Wikipedia did not exist there would still be reason to cheer the generative possibilities of the Internet, its capacity to bring people together in meaningful conversations, commerce, or action. There are leading examples of each—the community of commentary and critique that has evolved around blogging, the user-driven reputation system within eBay, the “civil society” type of gatherings fostered by Meetup, or the social pressure–induced promises via Pledgebank, each drawing on the power of individuals contributing to community-driven goals. But Wikipedia is the canonical bee that flies despite scientists’ skepticism that the aerodynamics add up.87 These examples will grow, transform, or fade over time, and their futures may depend not just on the public’s appetites and attention, but on the technical substrate that holds them all: the powerful but delicate generative Internet and PC, themselves vaulted unexpectedly into the mainstream because of amateur contribution and cooperation. We now explore how the lessons of Wikipedia, both its successes and shortcomings, shed light on how to maintain our technologies’ generativity in the face of the problems arising from their widespread adoption.

Posted by The Editors on March 16, 2008
Tags: Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 193

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)


No comments yet.

Gregory Kohs on paragraph 48:

I am fascinated that MyWikiBiz appears in this book. As it’s founder, I think that you did a good job summarizing the experience for the uninitiated. I would describe some things slightly differently — such as Wales and I “coming to an accomodation”. It was more accurately an ultimatum from Wales, and I accepted it in exchange for his public endorsement of the “Concordat”. He made clear to me that I didn’t have much room to bargain; in fact, at one point in the conversation he said, “Greg, be quiet for a minute and you might learn something.”

Unfortunately, the footnote links to Centiare are no longer live. The owner of that site changed directions, but I have copied some of the content relevant to your book to:

April 18, 2008 9:40 am
Gregory Kohs on paragraph 48:

Darn it — bumped the “Add comment” button. The link is:


One last note: the article “Arch Coal” that actually prompted Jimmy Wales to ban MyWikiBiz from Wikipedia was actually not written from any contract or payment from the Arch Coal corporation. It was an unpaid exercise on my part, just to see how long it would take for a short article about a Fortune 1000 company to get scraped into Wikipedia from my site. As history records, we learned a lot more than that about Wikipedia’s leadership from that one little experiment.

Thank you for this exposure and your fair assessment of the controversy. I now only cringe to think that Wikipedia will now see fit to have an article about the business, and I’ll get the same treatment that John Seigenthaler and Fuzzy Zoeller “enjoyed”.

April 18, 2008 9:45 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Whistleblower :

Congratulations, Mr. Kohs. You are another contributor to the initiative of using the internet as a marketing tool. Jimbo was right to ban you in the first place, but he himself a corporate scumbag now, so of course that wouldn’t last.

May 13, 2012 2:56 pm
Gregory Kohs on paragraph 48:

I can’t believe I wrote “it’s” (with the apostrophe) in the second sentence of my first comment. Ugh.

April 18, 2008 9:51 am
dc :

Very interesting, Mr. Kohs — thanks for sharing!

April 19, 2008 3:13 pm
Gregory Kohs on paragraph 39:

The Nature “study” comparing Wikipedia to Encyclopedia Brittanica was biased, was not peer-reviewed, and in fact was heavily criticized for its lack of scientific rigor. It appeared in Nature’s “News” section written by journalists, not scientists, and a rebuttal to the whole fiasco can be found here:


April 18, 2008 10:37 am
ted on paragraph 1:

This is what Boston was like, before 1976, and driving was clearly a combat sport, and if you were from out of town, you were completely lost, because the lack of a grid and the absence of law enforcement meant that there were very few rules. I do recall one local paper saying that the “last time anyone was pulled over for a traffic violation was in the time of Charlemagne…”

April 24, 2008 11:47 am
Andrew Magliozzi on paragraph 1:

The removal of all rules to create a Utopian driving civilization is interesting, but the point about Boston is well noted. There are many practices that work well in one culture but not in others. For instance, if Boston had free bicycles like the city of Amsterdam offers, you’d probably find one guy in Lynn with 10,000 bikes in his basement and none on the streets.

Sociologically speaking, citizenship of this type seems more likely in homogeneous populations as found in northern Europe. Diversity of minds and ideals, however, tend to muddle such citizenship. Of course, the internet is a place for those of like mind to congregate without barrier of geography. So, maybe there is a chance after all.

May 9, 2008 6:39 pm
Andrew Magliozzi on paragraph 14:

If there was every a “slow-to-change walled garden” ripe for being unleashed via the Internet, it is the sphere of Academia.

Some call the University the last utopian space on earth. Rather than shelter such a space, however, we should strive to make it relevant again - to extend that utopia to the world. Public discourse was once the primary concern of the scholars and thinkers: Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, etc.

That, in fact, is the primary goal of my current online endeavor, http://www.TheFinalClub.org

Check it out to read lecture-by-lecture blogs of Harvard classes by Harvard students.

May 12, 2008 5:44 pm
John Broughton on paragraph 32:

Regarding “There are currently only a handful of bureaucrats, and they are appointed by other bureaucrats.” - This is technically true but misses the point - on the English Wikipedia, bureaucrats are chosen in the same manner as administrators - after a nomination and a seven-day process of editors expressing “support” and “oppose” opinions, a bureaucrat decides if “rough consensus” has been achieved; if so, the nominee becomes a bureaucrat.

May 26, 2008 2:38 pm

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. Yale University Press. ISBN […]

June 23, 2008 5:07 pm

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. Yale University Press. ISBN […]

June 23, 2008 5:35 pm

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It - Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN […]

August 28, 2008 5:49 am
Matt Bepler on paragraph 1:

I would like to see the dutch concept applied at my college. Moreso with parking than driving. I do think pedestrian crosswalks are important, but a lot of the other “traffic signs” do seem redundant at times. Regarding parking - after a couple of tickets in a couple of weeks… it would be nice to rid the streets of parking signs, and just follow that last sentence of paragraph one. It probably wouldn’t “work”… long term, but one can dream…

October 1, 2008 5:48 pm

[…] depuis engendré bien des rejetons et est très souvent citée en exemple par les gurus du web2.0. Certains voient même dans la recette Wikipedia le remède aux maux qui menaceraient la survie […]

December 10, 2008 3:47 pm
Ricardo Clements on paragraph -1:

good luck

January 9, 2009 12:00 pm
Alexwebmaster on paragraph -1:

Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

March 3, 2009 4:36 am

[…] The Lessons of Wikipedia […]

June 12, 2009 6:43 am
ted on paragraph 53:

Anti-democratic tendencies?

September 30, 2009 6:53 pm
Daniel Arbix on paragraph 38:

Note 38 points to a “Note 2″. But this reference does not make much sense (and it is also not a glitch that would be solved by pointing to note 37, since Raymond’s quote is not from the “Release Early, Release Often” piece).

January 4, 2010 5:58 pm
L. Reese on paragraph 2:

On one hand, this concept has merit. There are numerous world wide examples of the effect on citizens from overzealous rule making and omnipresent authority. This can be seen in Murakami’s depictions of peoples’ reaction to the Tokyo subway gas attack. On the other hand, it’s difficult to imagine Americans adjusting well to a complete lack of rules and authority. We are brought up to look out for number one.

February 1, 2010 8:01 pm
Main Page | Wikipedia on whole page :

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It — Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300124873. http://yupnet.org/zittrain/archives/16. Retrieved […]

February 26, 2010 6:51 am

[…] Jonathan Zittrain The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It — Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. — Yale University Press, 2008. — ISBN […]

February 26, 2010 3:48 pm

[…] the agency’s official seal. Wikipedia has refused to remove the image from its FBI page. Wikipedians have a history of standing firm on controversial articles. It’s unclear whether a specific […]

August 10, 2010 9:59 am

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It — Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300124873. http://yupnet.org/zittrain/archives/16. Retrieved […]

January 13, 2011 9:41 pm

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It — Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300124873. http://yupnet.org/zittrain/archives/16. Retrieved […]

January 13, 2011 9:41 pm

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It — Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300124873. http://yupnet.org/zittrain/archives/16. Retrieved […]

January 13, 2011 9:41 pm
Brandon Svetz on whole page :

you are really a good webmaster. The web site loading speed is amazing. It seems that you’re doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a excellent job on this topic!

November 14, 2011 8:37 pm
Damaris Hobb on whole page :

Thanks for your post. One other thing is that if you are selling your property alone, one of the concerns you need to be mindful of upfront is just how to deal with home inspection reports. As a FSBO owner, the key about successfully switching your property and saving money upon real estate agent commission rates is expertise. The more you realize, the smoother your property sales effort will be. One area that this is particularly critical is information about home inspections.

December 7, 2011 2:23 am
Michal Hutzler on whole page :

Hello, you have a cool web site. I will favorite it and come back in the future. Thank you.

December 27, 2011 2:09 pm
tiffany schmuck ebay on whole page :

Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks Nonetheless I’m experiencing subject with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting identical rss drawback? Anybody who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

January 7, 2012 2:17 am
Virgilio on whole page :

Highly intriguing short article youve constructed - blogesaurus convertxtodvd free key The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It » Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia

March 10, 2012 12:00 am

[…] a b Zittrain, Jonathan. “Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia, in The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It”. Yale Books Unbound, Yale University Press. Retrieved […]

March 10, 2012 9:45 am

[…] depuis engendré bien des rejetons et est très souvent citée en exemple par les gurus du web2.0. Certains voient même dans la recette Wikipedia le remède aux maux qui menaceraient la survie […]

July 12, 2012 10:02 pm
albert einstein on whole page :

I really like reading and I think this website got some truly utilitarian stuff on it! .

July 20, 2012 9:17 am
Cleo Wyler on whole page :

Keep up the wonderful work , I read few blog posts on this website and I conceive that your site is very interesting and has sets of wonderful info .

August 1, 2012 10:12 am
Rashad S. Espinosa on whole page :

pretty intersting

October 2, 2012 3:28 am

[…] by zombiesatemyhomework “When people can come to take the welfare of one another seriously and possess the tools to readily assist and limit each other, even the most precise and well-enforced rule from a traditional public source may be less effective than that uncompelled goodwill.” – Jonathan L. Zittrain, ‘The Lessons of Wikipedia’ […]

October 29, 2012 4:34 am
Lori on paragraph -1:

I’m really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see
a nice blog like this one today.

November 5, 2012 5:14 pm
tüpbebek on paragraph -1:

Helpful information. Fortunate me I discovered your site by accident,
and I am shocked why this twist of fate did not happened
in advance! I bookmarked it.

November 10, 2012 11:26 pm

[…] Posted by jemmakay “When people can come to take the welfare of one another seriously and possess the tools to readily assist and limit each other, even the most precise and well-enforced rule from a traditional public source may be less effective than that uncompelled goodwill.” – Jonathan L. Zittrain, ‘The Lessons of Wikipedia’ […]

January 23, 2013 5:01 am
Kris Aus on whole page :

Fantastic get the job done! This may be the style of details that needs to be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines like google for not positioning this post larger! Come on around and go to my internet site . Thanks =)

April 13, 2013 1:46 pm

Im grateful for that website article.Truly shopping forward to examine more. Terrific.

May 24, 2013 10:19 pm
Euna Yelle on whole page :

Hello there I had been JUST ON YOURE Web site AND Really like IT. I’m Striving To begin My own Weblog BUT I’m Acquiring TROUBLE FINDING Had been To start out I’ll BE Back

May 27, 2013 3:54 pm
Angelo Marucci on whole page :

thanks, I believe your visitors could possibly want significantly more articles or blog posts similar to this carry on the superior get the job done.

May 27, 2013 4:11 pm
Damien Brill on whole page :

mobile phones and WIFI and most electronic applianes emit hardcore RADIATION (think Xray beam… microwave rays)

May 29, 2013 4:16 pm
Ollie Lovenduski on whole page :

Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do a little research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more clear from this post. I’m very glad to see such magnificent information being shared freely out there.

May 30, 2013 10:54 pm
kostka strzegom on whole page :

I enjoy, result in I discovered exactly what I was taking a look for. You have ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye

June 1, 2013 7:31 am

[…] Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet – And How to Stop It. Yale University Press. p. 140. […]

June 2, 2013 11:00 pm
elevategf on whole page :

I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently. I am quite certain I will learn lots of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

June 3, 2013 7:26 am
heel pain tampa on whole page :

Good day! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? With thanks

June 4, 2013 11:24 am
foot pain seattle on whole page :

Appreciating the hard work you put into your site and detailed information you present. It’s great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed material. Great read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

June 4, 2013 2:20 pm
Read the Full Article on whole page :

What i do not realize is in fact how you are not really much more smartly-favored than you might be now. You’re so intelligent. You understand therefore considerably when it comes to this topic, produced me for my part imagine it from numerous varied angles. Its like women and men are not involved unless it is something to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs outstanding. At all times maintain it up!

June 4, 2013 2:54 pm
heel pain Seattle on whole page :

Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to protect against hackers?

June 4, 2013 7:30 pm
foot pain Seattle on whole page :

Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share. Thanks!

June 4, 2013 8:15 pm
Nicole on paragraph -1:

It’s remarkable designed for me to have a web page, which is beneficial in favor of my know-how. thanks admin

June 4, 2013 11:11 pm

I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my web site :).

June 5, 2013 8:17 am

Thanks for the suggestions you have contributed here. Also, I believe there are several factors that really keep your automobile insurance premium all the way down. One is, to bear in mind buying motors that are in the good list of car insurance organizations. Cars which are expensive tend to be at risk of being robbed. Aside from that insurance is also good value of the car, so the more expensive it is, then higher the premium you only pay.

June 5, 2013 9:55 pm
gw2 power leveling on whole page :

Simply a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw outstanding style and design. “Competition is a painful thing, but it produces great results.” by Jerry Flint.

June 6, 2013 12:20 am
plantar fasciitis Denver on whole page :

Does your site have a contact page? I’m having trouble locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an e-mail. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

June 6, 2013 4:03 pm
heel pain Memphis on whole page :

Everyone loves what you guys are usually up too. This kind of clever work and exposure! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.

June 6, 2013 6:31 pm
flash drive data recovery on whole page :

Hello Dear, are you truly visiting this web site regularly, if so after that you will definitely obtain fastidious know-how.

June 7, 2013 12:38 am
pads wee wee on whole page :

Have you ever thought about creating an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.

June 7, 2013 3:33 pm
Jewel at Buangkok Price on whole page :

Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading through your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics? Thanks a lot!

June 7, 2013 8:02 pm
computer mouse on whole page :

Thanks for giving your ideas listed here. The other matter is that any time a problem develops with a computer motherboard, persons should not take the risk connected with repairing the item themselves for if it is not done correctly it can lead to irreparable damage to all the laptop. In most cases, it is safe just to approach a dealer of that laptop for that repair of motherboard. They’ve technicians with an experience in dealing with mobile computer motherboard difficulties and can make the right diagnosis and execute repairs.

June 9, 2013 4:27 am
chicago party limousines on whole page :

Perfect for that special someone on Valentine’s Day and Halloween!

June 9, 2013 12:05 pm
Get More Details on whole page :

Hey there, You’ve performed a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and individually suggest to my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this web site.

June 10, 2013 6:53 am
visit now on whole page :

What’s Going down i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It certainly practical and it has assisted me out loads. I hope to offer a contribution & aid other prospects like its aided me. Wonderful job.

June 10, 2013 9:24 am
click here on whole page :

power tools can truly save you from a lot of headache, specially when the job is incredibly hard,

June 10, 2013 3:21 pm
tax rebate uniform on whole page :

Do you have a spam issue on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; we have created some nice practices and we are looking to trade techniques with other folks, why not shoot me an email if interested.

June 10, 2013 4:08 pm
Luis Souto on whole page :

Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon. Kudos

June 10, 2013 10:53 pm
online marketing strategy on whole page :

Today, while I was at work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive a thirty foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

June 11, 2013 7:13 am
flymybutterfly.com on whole page :

I am curious to find out what blog platform you have been utilizing? I’m experiencing some small security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more secure. Do you have any solutions?

June 11, 2013 8:27 am
how to play piano on whole page :

I occur to become writing to generate you understand with the fantastic practical experience my friend’s daughter located applying the website. She came to understand a wide variety of particulars, not to mention how it is prefer to possess an amazing teaching character to acquire other people just have an understanding of selected specialized subject areas. You undoubtedly exceeded visitors’ expectations. I appreciate you for imparting these critical, safe, informative and in addition fun strategies in your subject to Sandra.

June 11, 2013 10:26 pm
kabel hdmi on whole page :

Hi there! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest writing a blog article or vice-versa? My website covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I believe we could greatly benefit from each other. If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Terrific blog by the way!

June 12, 2013 3:19 am
uchwyt do projektora on whole page :

Howdy would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using? I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a difficult time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique. P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

June 12, 2013 3:21 am
tech-led.pl on whole page :

Greetings! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading your articles. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects? Thanks for your time!

June 12, 2013 4:48 am

You can certainly see your enthusiasm within the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart. “Everyone has his day and some days last longer than others.” by Sir Winston Leonard Spenser Churchill.

June 12, 2013 1:00 pm
glass birds on whole page :

I’m really loving the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A small number of my blog audience have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any recommendations to help fix this problem?

June 12, 2013 6:35 pm
dobry katalog on whole page :

Very intriguing comments!

June 12, 2013 7:03 pm
lien on whole page :

We stumbled over here coming from a different web page and thought I might check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to looking over your web page for a second time.

June 12, 2013 8:11 pm
dobry katalog on whole page :

Thanks a lot! I love this log.

June 13, 2013 2:34 am
Read Full Article on whole page :

There are also so many video uploading websites, and these as well provide facility for sharing their video clips, however I think YouTube is the most excellent.

June 13, 2013 4:19 am
Celine Thaniel on whole page :

I simply wanted to say thanks once more. I am not sure what I might have handled in the absence of those creative concepts documented by you relating to this question. It absolutely was a real intimidating circumstance in my opinion, however , spending time with your specialised tactic you handled that forced me to cry over gladness. I’m just happy for your guidance and sincerely hope you know what an amazing job that you’re carrying out teaching others via a web site. Most probably you’ve never encountered all of us.

June 14, 2013 12:11 am

I will immediately snatch your rss feed as I can’t in finding your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know so that I may subscribe. Thanks.

June 14, 2013 7:02 am

Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions? Thanks

June 14, 2013 7:17 am

Wow! This could be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I’m also a specialist in this topic therefore I can understand your effort.

June 14, 2013 8:02 am
build a garden shed on whole page :

Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Appreciate it

June 14, 2013 11:17 pm
love spells on whole page :

I am really enjoying the theme/design of your weblog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A few of my blog readers have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?

June 15, 2013 1:37 pm
whoozin facebook on whole page :

I am curious to find out what blog system you have been using? I’m experiencing some small security issues with my latest blog and I’d like to find something more secure. Do you have any recommendations?

June 15, 2013 3:02 pm
payroll card on whole page :

Good post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Cheers!

June 15, 2013 4:27 pm
my website on whole page :

Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your site? My blog is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Thanks a lot!

June 17, 2013 8:10 am
Pedagogium on whole page :

Hi! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to check it out. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Excellent blog and excellent style and design.

June 18, 2013 10:02 am
Jeremy Remke on whole page :

The guidelines you provided here are rather precious. It had been such a pleasurable surprise to have that waiting for me as i woke up this very day. They are constantly to the point plus easy to learn. Thank you for the clever ideas you have shared right here

June 18, 2013 7:58 pm
zobacz on whole page :

Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!

June 19, 2013 5:30 am
Mariela Windley on whole page :

loads to read.. lovely blog… so simple and clean…your newest follower from bloggers:)

June 19, 2013 6:27 am
storage investment on whole page :

Hello! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading your posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics? Thanks for your time!

June 19, 2013 8:16 am
Suanne Debrot on paragraph -1:

An fascinating dialogue is value comment. I feel that it is best to write extra on this matter, it won’t be a taboo topic however usually individuals are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

June 19, 2013 9:30 am
visit on whole page :

Hey! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading through your articles. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics? Thank you!

June 19, 2013 10:06 am
ofama on whole page :

Currently it seems like Drupal is the best blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

June 19, 2013 10:11 am
strona WWW on whole page :

Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any recommendations for newbie blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

June 19, 2013 12:17 pm
Maps Integration on whole page :

Hi There, Great information on marketing from home on your website. Thanks, and I will returning for updates whenever I can.Many thanks,

June 19, 2013 3:00 pm
tata bp solar on paragraph 75:

This is a appropriate blog for would like to locate out about this topic. You realize a good deal its almost challenging to argue along (not that I personally would want…HaHa). You actually put the latest spin with a subject thats been discussed for a long time. Fantastic stuff, just fantastic!

June 20, 2013 7:32 am
website on whole page :

I like what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and reporting! Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve you guys to my own blogroll.

June 20, 2013 9:45 am
real palm trees on whole page :

Hi! Quick question that’s completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My blog looks weird when viewing from my iphone. I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to resolve this issue. If you have any recommendations, please share. Thanks!

June 20, 2013 1:08 pm
Kristen Stewart Images on whole page :

Wow, wonderful weblog format! How long have you been blogging for? you make running a blog glance easy. The overall glance of your website is excellent, let alone the content!

June 20, 2013 2:24 pm
www.Pawar.net.pl on whole page :

Hello there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting tired of Wordpress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

June 20, 2013 2:48 pm
Sanatorium Ciechocinek on whole page :

Hi! I know this is kinda off topic but I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My site goes over a lot of the same topics as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the way!

June 20, 2013 11:32 pm
Uzdrowisko Ciechocinek on whole page :

Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Ie. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Cheers

June 20, 2013 11:34 pm
ec.net.pl on whole page :

Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Ie. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the problem fixed soon. Kudos

June 21, 2013 2:00 am
pm portal on whole page :

Your blog would enhance in ranking in case you post additional often.,-`~-

June 25, 2013 9:00 am
sandaly damskie on whole page :

Hey, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Opera, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, great blog!

June 26, 2013 11:41 am
Zack Impson on whole page :

Thank you a lot for providing individuals with remarkably marvellous possiblity to read in detail from this website. It is always so pleasurable and stuffed with a lot of fun for me personally and my office colleagues to visit your blog a minimum of three times in a week to learn the fresh issues you have. And lastly, we’re at all times satisfied for the spectacular strategies you give. Selected 4 ideas on this page are honestly the finest we have had.

June 30, 2013 4:25 pm
mesin absensi kartu on whole page :

Do you alright if I quote your post on my Forum? I think your writing will match my visitors properly. Well, thanks for posting this posting.

July 1, 2013 1:40 am
Full Posting on whole page :

These are genuinely great ideas in on the topic of blogging. You have touched some fastidious points here. Any way keep up wrinting.

July 7, 2013 10:54 am
how to make passive income on whole page :

Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog? My blog site is in the very same area of interest as yours and my users would certainly benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Regards!

July 9, 2013 11:55 pm
Darell Lazenson on whole page :

With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any ways to help stop content from being stolen? I’d truly appreciate it.

July 10, 2013 9:54 pm
Titus Allgier on whole page :

Hi I am so thrilled I found your weblog, I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Digg for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a remarkable post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look over it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the awesome work.

July 11, 2013 9:10 am
Lou Antonopoulos on whole page :

Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your site in internet explorer, would test this… IE still is the market leader and a large portion of people will miss your excellent writing due to this problem.

July 11, 2013 6:33 pm
Erik Hopko on whole page :

I have figured out some significant things through your website post. One other point I would like to mention is that there are many games out there designed especially for preschool age small children. They involve pattern acknowledgement, colors, wildlife, and forms. These generally focus on familiarization as opposed to memorization. This will keep little ones occupied without feeling like they are learning. Thanks

July 13, 2013 4:25 am
click for source on whole page :

I’m gone to convey my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this website on regular basis to get updated from newest reports.

July 13, 2013 11:00 am
Ingrid Kinnaman on whole page :

Hi would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good web hosting provider at a fair price? Cheers, I appreciate it!

July 15, 2013 5:22 am
Russel Knickelbein on whole page :

Incredible! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a completely different subject but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Outstanding choice of colors!

July 15, 2013 5:53 am
Leigh Insco on whole page :

I like what you guys tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and coverage! Keep up the wonderful works guys I’ve you guys to our blogroll.

July 15, 2013 6:40 am
Dortha Lemen on whole page :

I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is needed to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% certain. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers

July 15, 2013 7:27 am
Tim Defelice on whole page :

Hey would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using? I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

July 15, 2013 4:45 pm

Keep up the excellent piece of work, I read few content on this internet site and I think that your web blog is real interesting and has circles of wonderful information.

July 15, 2013 10:00 pm

I got what you mean , appreciate it for posting .Woh I am happy to find this website through google. “I would rather be a coward than brave because people hurt you when you are brave.” by E. M. Forster.

July 15, 2013 10:33 pm
Learn More Here on whole page :

Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after browsing through many of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly pleased I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back frequently!

July 19, 2013 1:07 pm
Bodybuilding clothing on whole page :

Basically wanna say that this really is extremely helpful, Thanks for taking your time to create this.

July 22, 2013 1:11 am
this website on whole page :

If you apply these strategies for increasing traffic on your own web site, I am obviously you will get the change in few days.

July 23, 2013 3:02 pm
Leone Hepner on whole page :

The other day, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iphone and tested to see if it can survive a twenty five foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83 views. I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

July 23, 2013 9:11 pm
Jamey Portnoff on whole page :

Hey! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to look it over. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding blog and excellent design and style.

July 24, 2013 11:53 pm
Chau Gullatte on whole page :

Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your weblog. You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested. Many thanks!

July 25, 2013 6:45 am
visit this website link on whole page :

Great article. I am going through some of these issues as well..

July 26, 2013 1:50 pm
Weldon Spegal on whole page :

Welcome Steinbach! We are so energized to welcome you towards the Fruit Share relatives we know you’re planning to love it!

July 28, 2013 1:52 am
Phoebe Wilding on whole page :

Excellent post however I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Thanks!

July 29, 2013 7:43 am
Mitsue Notch on whole page :

I’m really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems? A couple of my blog audience have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome. Do you have any recommendations to help fix this problem?

July 30, 2013 1:05 am
Mervin Uzzle on whole page :

It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this fantastic blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

July 30, 2013 6:40 am

http://www.homeremodelingphiladelphia.org/ home remodeling philadelphia

July 31, 2013 3:25 pm
Cheats for poptropica on whole page :

Fantastic post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Bless you!

July 31, 2013 4:51 pm

It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this outstanding blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

July 31, 2013 6:12 pm

The most beneficial and clear News and why it means quite a bit.

August 2, 2013 10:57 am
sea horizon executive condo on whole page :

My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on various websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform. I have heard very good things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

August 2, 2013 4:45 pm
Carmelita Epps on whole page :

Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; we have developed some nice practices and we are looking to trade methods with other folks, why not shoot me an email if interested.

August 3, 2013 9:22 am
Clicking Here on whole page :

Hello! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to check it out. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Exceptional blog and outstanding design and style.

August 10, 2013 10:42 am
?????? on paragraph -1:

I believe this is among the so much significant info for me.
And i’m happy studying your article. However want to observation on few normal issues, The
site taste is ideal, the articles is actually excellent : D.
Just right process, cheers

September 7, 2013 5:04 am

Hello this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

September 10, 2013 3:11 pm
watch movies on whole page :

Howdy! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

September 18, 2013 5:14 pm
??????????? on paragraph -1:

I am really impressed together with your writing abilities and also with
the format for your weblog. Is that this a paid subject or did you modify
it your self? Either way stay up the nice high quality writing, it’s rare to look a great weblog like this one nowadays..

October 17, 2013 7:41 am
Dinorah Fritter on whole page :

Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog site? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear idea

November 8, 2013 11:30 pm
Kami Malcom on whole page :

Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is great, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It » Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia .

November 12, 2013 5:45 pm
Ronna Verser on whole page :

We have been a group of volunteers and opening a whole new scheme within our neighborhood. Your internet site presented us with beneficial information to work on. You may have accomplished an impressive position and our entire neighborhood is going to be grateful for you.

November 13, 2013 11:06 am
Kenneth Jilek on whole page :

Wow, marvelous blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is fantastic, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It » Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia .

November 15, 2013 11:23 am
Josette Lucier on whole page :

Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is great, as well as the content!. Thanks For Your article about The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It » Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia .

November 17, 2013 10:21 pm
best radar detectors on whole page :

uggs uggs ugssssssss! laser interceptor laser jammer

November 27, 2013 11:39 pm
radarandlaserforum on whole page :

my fashioneble bewts are brand name UGGS radar detectors california

November 27, 2013 11:40 pm
?????? ??? ????? on paragraph -1:

?????? ??? ????? Hi my friend!

I wish to say that this article is awesome, great written and include almost all significant infos.

I would like to look extra posts like this .
?????? ???

December 10, 2013 1:13 am
Margherita on paragraph -1:

Also, you cannot send direct meessages to Facebook and Twitter friends.
Android apps are designed for Android devices, however, and may not be as fun or as usable on a PC without controls like a touch screen and
accelerometer. Keep some holiday stress att baay by organizing your gift giving with these apps.

December 20, 2013 4:26 am
Grartitude | notkylegoodwin on whole page :

[…] up ^ Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It – Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12487-3. Retrieved December 26, […]

December 20, 2013 3:07 pm

Link exchange is nothing else exhept it is only placing the otheer person’s webpage
link on your page at suitable place and other person will also do same in
favor of you.

January 3, 2014 5:43 am
weight Loss diet questions on paragraph -1:

Hi! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new
iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all
your posts! Carry on the outstanding work!

January 19, 2014 10:29 am

Hey very cool website!! Man .. Excellent
.. Wonderful .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally?
I’m glad to search out numerous useful info here in the submit, we need develop extra techniques on this
regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

January 25, 2014 5:08 pm
poptropica secrets on paragraph -1:

Good day very cool blog!! Guy .. Excellent .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your website and
take the feeds additionally? I’m glad to seek out numerous helpful info here
in the submit, we’d like work out more strategies on this
regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

January 27, 2014 8:58 pm
This Site on whole page :

Though I am a white male, 50, I can relate to the things you’re thinking. Our society pigeonholes us and tries to snuff the actual light within. Therefore, thanks for your time for writing your story and your insight.

February 15, 2014 8:14 am
avicii 2014 tour dates on paragraph -1:

Although you most likely is not going to qualify for any very
expensive vehicle, it is possible to obtain auto financing while you’re
still waiting for your credit history to improve avicii 2014
tour dates get more information at global tel link advance pay.

February 28, 2014 3:06 am
Std Testing At Home on paragraph -1:

The first step to getting her aroused is understanding her.
A lot of men are extremely honest and delicate to have a lady arrive and destroy his heart.
In such instances, medication is not really needed. http://www.talkon.info/groups/human-diseases-brought-on-by-protists/

March 15, 2014 3:04 pm
@wagershack on paragraph -1:

A motivating discussion is worth comment. I believe that you need to write more on
this issue, it might not be a taboo matter but usually folks don’t speak about these issues.
To the next! Many thanks!!

March 18, 2014 1:39 pm
www.urlshortening.org on paragraph -1:

Let’s examine the annually (2008) prediction to the Far
east signal of the Wagering action. have viewed Halal Hamburgers.
As the expansion of Touch screen phone has created mailing messages away
from home more common inside You.Vertisements.

March 27, 2014 2:06 am
singing on paragraph -1:

I visited many web pages but the audio feature
for audio songs current at this web page is really excellent.

March 28, 2014 6:32 pm
youtube on paragraph -1:

Your style is unique compared to other people I have read stuff from.
Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll just bookmark this web site.

March 31, 2014 11:54 am
sbobet on paragraph -1:

I am in fact delighted to glance at this web site posts which contains tons
of helpful information, thanks for providing such information.

March 31, 2014 11:59 pm

Hi there I am so thrilled I found your web site,
I really found you by accident, while I was researching
on Yahoo for something else, Regardless I
am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for a remarkable post
and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time
to go through it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added your
RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read
more, Please do keep up the superb jo.

April 3, 2014 1:10 pm
Margarette on paragraph -1:

Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
Extremely useful info specially the last part :) I care for
such info much. I was looking for this certain
information for a very long time. Thank you and best of

April 5, 2014 3:03 am
football quotes on paragraph -1:

Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely
wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like
what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it wise.
I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is really a terrific site.

April 5, 2014 8:56 pm
watch review on paragraph -1:

Hi there, this weekend is good designed for me, since this occasion i am reading this
enormous educational article here at my residence.

April 6, 2014 12:22 pm
????????? on paragraph -1:

I think that what you posted was actually very reasonable.
But, consider this, suppose you were to write a awesome
post title? I am not saying your information isn’t solid., but suppose you added something that grabbed a person’s attention?
I mean The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It ? Chapter 6:
The Lessons of Wikipedia is a little plain. You should look at
Yahoo’s front page and watch how they create news titles to grab viewers to click.
You might add a video or a related pic or two to get
readers excited about what you’ve written. In my
opinion, it would bring your blog a little bit more interesting.

April 6, 2014 3:27 pm
??????????? on paragraph -1:

Hey very cool blog!! Guy .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark
your website and take the feeds also? I’m glad to
find numerous useful info here in the publish, we need develop extra techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.
. . . . .

April 7, 2014 8:15 pm
??????????????? on paragraph -1:

This is very interesting, You are an overly skilled blogger.
I’ve joined your feed and sit up for in search of extra
of your great post. Additionally, I’ve shared your web site
in my social networks

April 7, 2014 9:17 pm
???????????? on paragraph -1:

My family members all the time say that I am wasting my time here at net, except
I know I am getting know-how everyday by reading
thes good articles or reviews.

April 8, 2014 12:45 am
????????? on paragraph -1:

I’m curious to find out what blog system you are utilizing?
I’m experiencing some minor security issues with my latest
blog and I would like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any suggestions?

April 10, 2014 9:18 pm
m88 on paragraph -1:

Terrific article! This is the kind of info
that are meant to be shared around the web. Disgrace on
Google for now not positioning this publish higher! Come on over
and visit my website . Thanks =)

April 10, 2014 10:29 pm
what is the venus factor on paragraph -1:

May I simply just say what a comfort to find an individual who really understands
what they are talking about over the internet.
You actually understand how to bring an issue
to light and make it important. More people need to check this out and understand this
side of the story. It’s surprising you’re not more popular because you surely
possess the gift.

April 10, 2014 10:52 pm
m88 on paragraph -1:

Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thanks, However I am going through difficulties with your RSS.
I don’t know why I cannot subscribe to it. Is there anybody else having identical RSS issues?
Anyone that knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

April 11, 2014 7:07 pm
???????????????? on paragraph -1:

I truly love your website.. Excellent colors & theme.
Did you create this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m attempting to
create my own website and would love to find out where you
got this from or just what the theme is called. Thanks!

April 12, 2014 8:30 pm

Someone necessarily lend a hand to make seriously posts
I’d state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and up to now?
I amazed with the analysis you made to make this particular publish amazing.

Wonderful process!

April 14, 2014 11:09 pm
slotomania cheats on paragraph -1:

Wonderful site. A lot of useful information here. I am sending it to
a few pals ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thanks in your

April 16, 2014 7:11 pm
clash of clans gold hack on paragraph -1:

Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from
somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really
make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your theme.

April 18, 2014 3:35 pm
porn on paragraph -1:

I’m amazed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and interesting, and without a
doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is
something which too few folks are speaking intelligently about.

I’m very happy that I came across this in
my search for something relating to this.

April 19, 2014 10:50 pm
????????????? on paragraph -1:

You made some decent points there. I looked on the net
to learn more about the issue and found most people will go along with
your views on this site.

April 23, 2014 2:07 pm
????????????? on paragraph -1:

When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added”
checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment.
Is there any way you can remove me from that service?
Many thanks!

April 23, 2014 2:57 pm
????????????? on paragraph -1:

Quality posts is the secret to interest the visitors to go to see the site,
that’s what this site is providing.

April 23, 2014 3:19 pm